|
|
/// DANA AWARDS /// ANNUALLY SINCE 1996
A NOTE OF ENCOURAGEMENT TO FUTURE ENTRANTS: In 2006, THE NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW named as one of the 10 Best Books of the Year in Non-Fiction our 2001 winner of the Dana Award in the Novel. To explain: Danielle Trussoni's novel, originally entitled Tunnel Rat, won our 2001 Novel Award. It was subsequently re-worked as a memoir of her relationship with her father, a Viet Nam vet, and published in 2006 as FALLING THROUGH THE EARTH. That memoir went on to be named by the New York Times Book Review as one of the 10 Best Books of 2006 in Nonfiction.
We offer three $1,000 awards annually in the Novel, Short Fiction, and Poetry, our traditional awards since we began in 1996. A fourth award, the $3,000 PORTFOLIO AWARD, offered from 2003-2007, HAS BEEN SUSPENDED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. OTHER SOURCES WHICH MAY LIST THE PORTFOLIO AWARD ARE NOT CORRECT. For GUIDELINES and more information about us, click on our LINKS ON THE LEFT BORDER OF THIS PAGE. WE DO NOT PROMISE PUBLICATION (see below). THE PURPOSE OF THE DANA AWARDS IS MONETARY ENCOURAGEMENT FOR WORK THAT HAS NOT YET BEEN RECOGNIZED. SO ALL WORK SHOULD BE UN-AWARDED (honorable mention and finalist recognition okay, but no monetary awards), unpublished in print or online (except copies for family and friends) and not under promise of award or publication AT THE TIME IT'S SUBMITTED TO US. SIMULTANEOUS SUBMISSION IS FINE WITH US. Because we can’t promise publication, once you submit to us you may then market that work simultaneously to other competitions, journals, and publishers during the time we are considering it and still be eligible for Dana Awards.
WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR Whether fiction or
poetry, it must be work that is original yet not merely sensational for
the sake of sensation. It must contain clear, well-developed themes and be
written in a style that exhibits love of language and mastery of craft. Furthermore, a
group of words that ‘plays’ with language without attempting meaning
or message is not a poem, it’s an exercise. HOW WE STARTED As a writer who entered competitions myself, I was often mystified when I read winners' work--often I disagreed with the judges' choices. Then I realized that as first reader for my own competition, I could steer toward reward what I deemed good work. I also knew
that by starting my own competition and casting my editor's net into the
wide pool of work out there, I could see how my own writing measured up to
other hopefuls'. Which is
heartening for the sake of literature, but frightening because of the
sheer numbers of good writers looking for recognition--so much competition
for each one of us, and so many people who deserve notice but aren't
getting it. PUBLICATION IS NOT PART OF OUR CONTRACT.
We affiliated with CENTER as our publisher that year as a courtesy to our winners, not as a part of a promised contract. We promise only monetary awards each year. This courtesy arrangement will also be true if/when we find another journal to publish any future winners. Our contract with our winners ends with us paying them the monetary Dana Awards. Any publication or further payment is between the winners and the literary journal. Also, it is our winners’ choice, not a requirement, to publish with any journal with which we form an affiliation. Furthermore, since our contract with winning authors ends when we pay them their award money, we can not be held responsible if a journal promises and then fails to publish. FOR QUESTIONS ONLY, E-MAIL AT THIS ADDRESS danaawards@pipeline.com or |